Right Or Wrong - 1555 Words

Right or Wrong? (A depiction on the fact that even educators can be challenged if you test the words that are spoken by the teachers.) In the year 427 BC a baby boy was born to distinguished family in Athens. He was born into a family of four. With his brothers Glaucon and Adeimantus his life was what everyone else envied. Plato had everything, but one day he met a man that was teaching in the town square. Socrates shared idea about wisdom, justice and the true meaning of life. When Plato was twenty-eight his teacher was executed for the words he had spoken. Plato was angry for what the Athenians had done to a wise man. In response Plato quite politics and became a philosopher. His new life mission became to share the message his teacher died sharing. He created his own views, but published what is known as the Republic. These views and ideas have been read by thousands of people. However, even though people see all that Plato wrote and there are things that an individual might agree with there are also things that are considered controversies. Plato was a man who wanted people to question what he said. Plato wante d students who would challenge him and not be led blindly. Glaucon was the perfect student who listened to what people had to say and then challenging the information provided. â€Å"The whole function of education is not to put knowledge into the soul, but to bring out the best things that are latent to the soul, and to do so by directing it to the right objects.†Show MoreRelatedIs The Right Or Wrong?1404 Words   |  6 Pagesfoot on this Earth we have been wired into believing what is right and what is wrong. Right and wrong originated with an opinion, therefore making the world we live in completely flawed. Everything we perceive to be the right thing to do, could have possibly been the opposite if someone had said so. Today, right and wrong is based off of the majority of society and what we believe affects what we chose to do. There is no right or wrong, not even morals, just actions. Humans act on impulse and doubtRead MoreRight And Wrong1007 Words   |  5 PagesForg ive me if I seem distracted, I’ve been preoccupied of late with questions of morality. Of right and wrong, what’s just and what’s not. Sometimes the delineation between the two is a sharp line, not to be crossed, other times that line is skewed, blurred even. But these questions...these questions are vital ones, because they tether us to humanity. As such, I invite you to consider these questions with me. At some point in your lives, all of you here are liable to wind up in a courthouse. TrafficRead MoreIs It A Right Or Wrong?1536 Words   |  7 Pagesfeel more right than someone else. Your evidence can be true to prove a point, but also someone else s can be true too and just have a different approach to it. This may result in a disagreement over who has the best way to do it. The world is filled with different people, which will result in multiple ways to do certain things even if the facts are the same. Sometimes we get into arguments with people over the simplest stuff because of the things we believe or think are morally right based on ourRead MoreIs It Right Or Wrong? Essay1611 Words   |  7 Pagessometimes forget our own limits as a mortal species. Genetic therapy has the potential to save millions of people from genetic mutations and protein deficiencies. This paper will go on to argue that the Utilitarianism approach in ethics shows all the right things about genetic the rapy. The first-time gene therapy was used on a patient dates back in the 1990s when a four-year-old girl had adenosine deaminase deficiency. With this disease, her white blood cells were not doing their job and left her proneRead MoreA Right Or A Wrong910 Words   |  4 PagesA Right or A Wrong Matthew Donnelly loved life. But Matthew wanted to die. For thirty years, he had conducted research on the use of x-rays. Now, skin cancer riddled his tortured body. He had lost his nose, his left hand, two fingers on his right hand, and part of his jaw. He was left blind and was slowly deteriorating. The pain was unrelenting. Doctors estimated that he had a year to live. Lying in bed with excruciating pain, he pleaded to be put out of his misery, he wanted to die now. His pleasRead MoreIs It Right Or Wrong?1808 Words   |  8 Pagesthere are personal choices involved when deciding if an action is right or wrong, violence in a society hinges on the ideology of authority. When an authority figure has an ideology that encourages violence a society will be more prone to accept brutality because of the importance of leadership. People generally are brought up to view authority as something that should be obeyed and respected, making it harder to distinguish what is right when obedience means violence. Moreover, the ideology of a leaderRead MoreNo Right Or Wrong?1920 Words   |  8 Pagesthat branch off of it, many of which have popped up in recent years. Yet, what people do not realize is that bisexuality, like many other sexual orientations, can be fluid and different for each person choosing to identify with it. There is no right or wrong definition; yet we normally only see one definition when bisexuality is talked about. And that is if it is talked about at all. Bisexuality is often left out of LGBTQIA+ representation, or is portrayed in a stereotypical way that makes it hardRead MoreAbortion : Right Or Wrong?985 Words   |  4 PagesAbortion: Right or Wrong? The famous writer Larry Barretto said, Babies are bits of stardust blown from the hand of God.† Abortion takes away a baby’s life, which begins at conception. A fetus’s heart begins to beat in just the first few weeks of the pregnancy. Women can have an abortion up to 9 weeks into the pregnancy. At nine weeks, the infant can make a fist, and the head is almost half the size of the entire body. The baby begins to have buds for baby teeth to appear. Some women still haveRead MoreWho Is The Right Or Wrong?885 Words   |  4 PagesReid to assume that this is truly demonstrated in those men of legitimate honor, extraordinary and rare as they may be. A sense of morality is presumed to be innate in all capably reasonable human beings. This predisposition of what is morally right or wrong is engrained in our consciousness. Participating in amiable acts heightens one’s appraisal of themselves, and a feeling of worth is a satisfactory experience for that individu al, restricting its ability to be classified as an act of selflessnessRead MoreWho Is The Right Or Wrong?976 Words   |  4 PagesFrom deciding to get up on time to obeying traffic laws, we have to differentiate between whether what we are about to do or what we are currently doing is right or wrong. This internal judgment of distinguishing whether an act is right or wrong is called morality, but does an act have to be done for the sake of morality, in order to be morally right or have moral worth? According to German philosopher and founder of Kantianism, Immanuel Kant, â€Å" It is impossible to imagine anything at all in the world

Marxist Comparison Between the Heart of Darnkess and One...

Marxist Comparison Between The Heart Of Darkness and One Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest The definition of classism is the belief that people from certain social or economic classes are superior to others. When viewed from a Marxist perspective, Ken Keseys One Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest and Joseph Conrads Heart of Darkness can be seen as a comment on negative treatment of lower class individuals. In the Heart of Darkness the way the Europeans treated the lower class Africans was quite inhumane. As for in One Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest the patients there were truly mistreated because of their class of being mentally ill. A Marxist theory can give you a better idea of how bad the class fight truly was between the Europeans and Africans.†¦show more content†¦They basically killed him. This devastated Chief and he couldnt leave his friend this way, I mashed the pillow into the face. I lay there on top of the body for what seemed days. (Keseys,4.4.99). Nurse Ratched believed she cured McMurphy of his mental illness when he wasnt even mentally ill to begin with. She was only using her authority over him to punish and silence him. Chief put McMurphy out of his misery and not allowing nurse Ratched to win. She also used her authority to basically kill Billy. She emotionally belittled him and threatened to talk to his mother. She refused to stop even after he begged her too. This ultimately made Billy take his own life. The patients only had each other for support and comfort despite being in a hospital where one would assume they would be treated well in every possibly way and not belittled or abused. The staff believed they were better than the patients and used their authority to control them however they wanted. Both books showed a different kind of mistreatment to people by individuals who believed they were above or better than them but when looked at through a Marxist theory they are both mistreatment of a lower class. When breaking down The Heart of Darknes s by Joseph Conrad and One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest by Ken Kesey from a Marxist perspective you really see how poorly the lower class was mistreated. The Europeans ruined the Natives lives as

Ethics Simulation free essay sample

Ethical dilemmas are a constant in the business world. In order for an individual to be adaptive to the ever changing rolls of their jobs it is in their best interest to research their company’s standard operating procedures as well as being informed on new company policies that are being implemented. In doing this research however, the individual will notice that specific problems are not always documented or covered in these manuals. In the area of ethics, people who are given authority must use various lenses to ensure that the company is meeting the expectations of its employees to guarantee their rights and fair treatment. Developing these virtuous attributes is geared at developing cohesion amongst employees, efficiency, and developing a positive reputation. Although there are many ways to resolve an intercompany dispute, the most ethically sound decision comes from people in positions of power being informed of the issue and setting their sights on ensuring fairness and ruling in favor of the option that creates the greatest overall good. This paper will examine the two Ethics Game examples and follow the worksheet format for answering questions. The issue presented in dilemma number one arises from an employee named Aaron Webb who posted sensitive company information. His posting was not derogatory in nature however the information is considered private. Many companies guard their information and keeping their core competencies sacred in order to remain competitive. Another employee named Jamal Moore sent an anonymous message revealing through hacking into Webb’s computer that Webb has many of these sensitive files loaded on his personal computer. The issue arises of how to respect the personal views of employees outside of the workplace. The primary stakeholders for this issue are the shareholders, the General Counselor, the Director of IT, the VP of HR, Jamal Moore, and Aaron Webb. Some of the duties that the company makes clear are allowing the employee the right to voice their opinion, as guaranteed by the first amendment to the constitution. However, an employer may legally limit this right if the information is considered private and proprietary. Management has the duty to make sure that its information isn’t leaked for the sake of all other stakeholders. There is a duty to address concerns about the company. By allowing this type of communication, problems are clarified and avoided. Employees should be happy when their rights to privacy are protected, their concerns are heard, and important information is guarded. In this dilemma, shareholders have a medium impact. How the company is viewed and evaluated by the public may decrease shareholder confidence and decrease its value. The CLO has a medium impact because his or her judgment may be called into play and reflect their decision making abilities. The VP of HR and the Director of Safety and Security have low impact when it comes to this problem as long as they have both fulfilled their obligations with informing the ultimate decision makers of the problem. Jamal Moore and Aaron Webb have high impact on this decision because this dilemma could potentially end their employment abilities or lead to punishment. My core values of the situation are embodied by recognizing loyalty. Although these employees may be misguided, more information given to them on the issue at hand could serve to make them better employees and avoid litigation. All members of the company must come to a deeper understanding that sensitive materials should be handled with care. As long as the integrity of the department is secured, the company can still benefit. In the second dilemma, there is a need for a security policy that provides for the safety of employees and also accommodates special needs, such as for Aisha Mullah, who is muslim and religiously not allowed to uncover her face in the work environment. The stakeholders in this situation are the company shareholders, the VP of HR, the Associate Director of Operations, other employees, the Training Manager, and Aisha Mullah. As an employee, you should be guaranteed that processes be followed. The right to be informed about security policies and exceptions should also be guaranteed. Arguably the most important, the right to express one’s opinion about policies and their impact should be guaranteed as well. The option that best suits this situation is to implement a photo I. D.  security system and to make accomodations for individuals with special needs. This will have a positive effect on the stakeholders, demonstrating the company’s ability to adapt to the needs of various individuals and be progressive in a diverse world. This decision reflects my core values by not excluding anyone on the basis of religion. Managing diversity means providing the climate for a productive workplace and seeking out qualified employees who should not be the subject of judgment or overlooked due to their race, creed, disability, sex, or place of origin. Other employees see this fairness and view it as attractive. A harsh, less understanding work environment drives employees away. By giving timely feedback to Aisha, treating her fairly, and upholding the company values, the company is strengthened. As a person of power, self development is a continual process and allows an individual to prepare for difficult decisions such as these. On the first simulation, a score of 1 out of 5 was achieved which demonstrates a relatively low risk. On the second simulation a score of 0 out of 5 was achieved which shows virtually no risk. Overall points earned were 25,600 out of 29,000. Important rights to remember for this project are the first amendment to the Constitution, and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. People of the United States are guaranteed the right to freedom of speech, and expression. People of the United States are also guaranteed that employers will not discriminate on the basis of religious beliefs. By using the ethical lenses which were demonstrated through this simulation, future leaders of America can be more informed on how to best handle intercompany issues while providing for the best option to all the stakeholders involved. We must be aware of the four lenses and know how to identify the key factors. By being informed and choosing the most virtuous choice available, companies will poise themselves to achieve high praises from their communities, their shareholders, and the stakeholders, down to the individual whose liberties and rights were defended.

Theatre In Wyoming Essays - Theatre, Wyoming,

Theatre In Wyoming Theatre in Wyoming There you are sitting in a theatre watching a play. You say to yourself, this play could be so much better if they would do that different. Of course the designers could do things differently, they might have even considered the same things that you have, the only thing wrong with that is that type of stuff takes money. What most people don't realize is that the theatres in Wyoming are very under funded. Theatres in Wyoming are not able to support themselves alone they need outside funding. Every play that is put on has a budget. This budget is split into different amounts for each department in the theatre. This is all of the money that they're allotted. The department has to try extremely hard to stay under budget. Of course this is common sense. Except this is hard to do when a performance needs things and the set needs things. All of these things that the departments need and want costs money. This is why the technical director has to decide exactly what the show can have to make it great and what it can't. That's why people say that the play could be better if? We just don't have the funding. People that agree with the statement theatres in Wyoming are not able to support themselves alone have their own reasons for this belief. Tammy Jackson of Cody says, No because educational and non- profit theatre isn't a high priority among the entities that primarily fund them. I agree with this statement. Until there is a bigger interest in the theatre this will always be a problem. If the theatres were supported the same as sports then this problem wouldn't be such a problem (Eckardt). Chuck Erven responds to this statement by saying, No. Audiences are limited, Wyoming has a lower arts endowment and private giving than any other state. Some people disagree with my opinion. Some people think that the theatres in Wyoming can support themselves. Ann Eckardt says, Yes, they can but it would be the equivalent of substance farming. The learning and the growth could barely be measured. I think she's saying that because the theatre is such a learning experience that anything can and will happen to help. This means that no matter how much a person thinks they know there is always something that a person can learn. The theatre world changes everyday with new technologies popping up. Such things like new lights and different types of ways to make scenery. The theatres in Wyoming isn't just under funded it's very under funded. There is an association called the National Endowments for the Arts (NEA) that has the power to decide what states get money for their theatre programs. This program has the power to disperse $5,000,000 for Arts Education Partnership Grants (NEA: Arts in Education), $5,610,000 for Musical Theatre (NEA: Opera- Musical Theatre), $8,825,000 for Theatre Programs (NEA: Theatre Programs), and $27,467,000 for Basic State Grants (NEA: State and Regional Programs). Out of all of this money the NEA divides it up among different states. Out of all of this money Wyoming doesn't get a single dime (NEA: Art Forms). This isn't fair. Most of this money goes to California and New York. They chose to give this money to companies and colleges that can definitely support themselves and still have money to spare. I think they need to consider giving money to the states that have the potential to have good companies if they were given a chance. One such state would be Wyoming. Wyoming gets about 80% to 90% of its money from the state money. This money goes towards salaries and running costs (Erven). There are a few forms of funding available for Wyoming. One such funding is State Arts Council National Endowment for Arts (Erven). The one major grant that CWC puts in for is the Wyoming Arts Council (Erven). There are a lot of ways that we can solve this problem in Wyoming, some of which have been tried. Some of them work and some of them don't. One person thinks that we could Seek corporate sponsorships and partnerships much like athletics have done (Jackson). This is